Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Responsibility in Home Loans Goes Both Ways

Whilst watching the news on a local Phoenix TV Station recently, I came across a human interest story about a couple who were in danger of losing their Phoenix home as they could not afford the payments. In this case, the homeowners had an interest rate of 9%, we will get to that later, and the mortgage broker who had arranged the loan in the first place had told them that would refinance after a few months in order to get lower monthly payments.

Firstly, they did not have great credit, plus they had no down-payment, hence the aforementioned interest rate. Also, given those circumstances, they were gambling that home prices in the Valley of the Sun would go up, of course they didn’t, which would enable them to refinance with a better loan-to-value ratio, they couldn’t. The fact is, they could not really afford the payments in the first place, and were using their meager savings to supplement them until re-financing. It was a house of cards, and it all came tumbling down. Yes, it is sad, but also quite predictable. If you are paying 9% in a 6% world something is not right. If you cannot afford the initial payments don’t take the loan. Do not take an adjustable rate loan with a low teaser start rate if you know you will not be able to afford the payments when the honeymoon period is over. Do not gamble that your home will increase in value in the next 6-12 months. You don’t know! Nobody knows. Some, but not all, lenders are quite willing, and ethically-challenged enough, to tell you anything you want to hear, in order to get you to sign on the dotted line. This is not an Arizona specific problem, it could happen anywhere.

The second case involved a gentleman in California who re-financed his home in order to finance his home-based used car business. The lender failed to supply, as required by California law, the loan documents translated into the language used predominantly in the negotiation. The borrower claimed he was duped, however he did admit an English speaking friend had read and translated the terms of the loan to him. Now he could not afford the payments and was looking to lay off the blame. In this case, I know for a fact that in order to be a car dealer in California, you must (amongst other requirements) have a storage facility for at least four cars, not at your residence. It must be completely separate. My point is, in this case, the borrower was quite willing, and ably abetted by the lender, to circumvent the rules while it suited his agenda. When he could not make the payments, he cried foul.

In both these cases, the borrowers played a little loose with the rules, or ignored early warning signs in pursuit of their goals. The will both certainly pay a price in the future because of bad credit, late payments and maybe even foreclosures.

Studies have shown that many times ethnic minorities end up paying more for their home loans than other folks. What the P.C. police do not tell you is that in most of those cases the victims were taken advantage of by people of the same ethnicity, that is to say unscrupulous people taking advantage of their own. In the end we are responsible for our actions, but remember everything must be in writing. If the broker “said”, then have him put it in writing. If he won’t, well you know the rest.

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Property Pricing In a Falling Market

This past weekend, a colleague asked me to join him in a visit to a homeowner who wanted a frank and brutal assessment of his home’s value. As usual, we prepared a bunch of comps, i.e. recently sold homes plus a list of currently available homes. This last list is less helpful, obviously, as the homes have not yet sold, but is somewhat helpful as they will at least indicate an upper price level by virtue of their listing price.

We started out by touring the home and making notes on various maintenance matters that should be rectified to better show the home. Pointers were also given on room staging to make better use of the available space. All in all, a fine home, with a pool, from a respected builder with all the right upgrades in both kitchen and bathrooms.

Them come the moment of truth “How much is it worth?” said Mr. Straight Shooter. “Seven Ninety Nine” I replied. Well, we gave him some smelling salts and when he came around it seemed he thought he was somewhere in the low $900K area.

How come we were so far apart? Well, the main point of his argument was a similar home that seemed to have sold for $915,000 about a year earlier. The problems with that are many. Firstly, a sale a year ago is useless to an appraiser. They prefer to go back 3 months as a rule, or six months if absolutely necessary. Secondly, this particular home sold in a week, for cash, to an out of state buyer. When folks pay cash, some of the checks and balances of a normal transaction are lost i.e. an appraisal and a bank watching over you. Who knows, the price may have included all the furniture and the $100,000 R.V. in the driveway. We do not know. We do know that an appraiser would have many questions regarding the sale of a home that seems to have sold for an excessive amount before an underwriter would allow him to use that comp.

I then pointed out that three similar homes had sold in the mid to high $700K range quite recently. He replied that they just “dumped” them to screw up the neighborhood! Believe you me, this is not the first time I have heard this “conspiracy” theory.

I then pointed out that there were three similar homes listed, but still unsold, in the low $800K range, that have been on the market for between 210 and 270 days. Anyone can list a home at whatever price they like, but if you want to sell a home you have to price it right. It has to be priced so well that a potential buyer in the price range has to see it. In this current market there are a lot less buyers, so they can pick and choose freely.

Finally, he told me that if he priced it too low (i.e. to actually sell) the neighbors would be mad at him. Well, you know what they say. “Misery loves company.”